Legal Opinion
Cook v. Layman
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 22, 2003No. CIV-F-00-6926 OWW SMSPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANT’S CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WANGER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff United States of America moves for summary judgement on its foreclosure action against Defendant Layman (“Motion”). See Doc. 55, filed September 18, 2002. Plaintiff seeks to enforce Magistrate Judge Snyder’s ruling that the tax hens attach to the subject property and it is authorized to foreclose those hens against certain real property. Defendant Layman opposes Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment ((“Opposition”) see Doc.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Charles M. KEENAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank HALL, Director Oregon Department of Corrections, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Triton Energy Corp. v. Square D Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Unocal Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2003