Legal Opinion

Foster v. Kopp

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 6, 1940No. 34,577PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.;

Plaintiff, an osteopathic physician, sued defendant for $39.50 on account for the treatment of his wife. Defendant admitted owing $19.50, but denied liability for any further sum, and by way of counterclaim attempted to plead a cause of action for damages in the sum of $300 on the theory that plaintiff, by malpractice, breached his implied contract to properly osteopathically treat defendant’s wife. At the close of the evidence the court instructed the jury to return a verdict for plaintiff for the amount sued for. This was done. Defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Travis v. BishoffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  2. Taylor v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  3. Coulter v. SharpSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Noel v. ProudSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  2. Cassity v. BradySupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  3. Ruby Lupton, Administrator of the Estate of Lois Elaine Laptad, Deceased, and Cross-Appellee v. Peter Torbey, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
  4. Criqui v. Blaw-Knox Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  5. Cornett v. City of NeodeshaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API