Legal Opinion

Abel v. Kowalski

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 22, 1996No. 94-988PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

A Bill Hatch purportedly appears pro se, but tenders a motion on behalf of appellants Allen Abel and Liberty Real Estate, requesting certain documents be added to the record on appeal. First, we note that Hatch is not a licensed attorney and may not practice law in Arkansas. See Ark. Code Ann. § 16-22-206 (1987); see also All City Glass & Mirror, Inc. v. McGraw Hill Information Sys. Co., 295 Ark. 520, 750 S.W.2d 395 (1988). Therefore, Hatch may not represent Abel or Liberty Real Estate in this case. Second, the appeal record reflects the original transcript in this case was filed in the court…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. All City Glass & Mirror, Inc. v. McGraw Hill Information Systems Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Davenport v. LeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Preston v. University of Arkansas for Medical SciencesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Davidson Properties, LLC v. SummersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  4. Smithco Investments of West Memphis, Inc. v. Morgan Keegan & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  5. Bouland v. Erwin Keith IncCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API