Legal Opinion

Preston v. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 6, 2003No. 03-120PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert L. Brown, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing the complaint of appellants Richard L. Preston and Gloria Preston. The Prestons raise the following points on appeal: (1) their complaint filed by non-licensed attorneys should not nullify their cause of action because their complaint was filed within the time limits of the statute of limitations; and (2) the trial court erred in granting the appellee doctors’ motions to deem their requests for admission of facts admitted. We hold that the points raised on appeal have no merit, and we affirm.

On November 17, 1999, Richard…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McKenzie v. BurrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  2. Davenport v. LeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Arkansas Bar Association v. Union National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  4. Goff v. Harold Ives Trucking Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Abel v. KowalskiSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Brewer v. PooleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  2. Gregory Tyler Moore v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017
  3. Preston v. StoopsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  4. Quality Optical of Jonesboro, Inc. v. Trusty Optical, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  5. Posey v. St. Bernard's Healthcare, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API