All City Glass & Mirror, Inc. v. McGraw Hill Information Systems Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Darrell Hickman, Justice.
The trial court ruled that the appellant corporation had to be represented by an attorney and would not allow the corporation’s president, a non-lawyer, to appear on behalf of the corporation. We find no error in the court’s decision and affirm the judgment.
The appellee sued the appellant on the balance of an account, asking for $597.50. Jimmy Overton, the corporation’s president, filed an answer on behalf of the corporation and appeared at a hearing before the court. The trial judge struck the answer and would not allow Overton to act as counsel; the judge ruled that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McKenzie v. BurrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- Arkansas Bar Association v. Union National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
- Dale v. SuttonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
3Cited by17 opinions
- Davenport v. LeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Associates Financial Services Co. of Oklahoma, Inc. v. Crawford County Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Abel v. KowalskiSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Smithco Investments of West Memphis, Inc. v. Morgan Keegan & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- McAdams v. Pulaski County Circuit CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.