Legal Opinion
Byrum v. Maryott
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided May 6, 1975No. 813, September Term, 1974Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
26 Md. App. 130 (1975)
337 A.2d 142
ELIZABETH Y. BYRUM ET VIR
v.
CARLTON MARYOTT ET AL.
No. 813, September Term, 1974.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.
Decided May 6, 1975.
John C. Lowe with whom was Robert Anthony Jacques on the brief, for appellants.
Michael J. Budow with whom were Joseph Patrick Clancy and Clancy & Pfeifer on the brief, for appellees.
2Opinion of the Court · ThompsonThompson, J.
SMITH, J., dissents and filed a dissenting opinion at page 139 infra.
Elizabeth and Barney Byrum, appellants, sued Carlton and Arthur Maryott in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County for damages to Mrs. Byrum and their marital relationship…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited33 opinions
- Ager v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- Kujawa v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Hutzell v. BoyerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Ruud v. GrimmSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
- City of Barnesville v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.