Legal Opinion

Kujawa v. Baltimore Transit Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 24, 1961No. [No. 115, September Term, 1960.]PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorney, J.

Claiming, primarily, that the jury verdicts were inadequate, the plaintiffs-appellants (the Kujawas, Elizabeth M., Sylvester H., and Sylvester A., mother, son and husband-father respectively) appealed from the judgments entered by the trial court on the verdicts for and against the defendants-appellees (The Baltimore Transit Company and George Ford).

The jury assessed total damages of $3,315—$500 to the mother and $2,700 to the son for personal injuries and $115 to the husband-father for loss of services and hospital and medical expenses—against both defendants, but the trial court entered a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Casey v. Roman Catholic ArchbishopCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  2. Ager v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  3. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  4. Bowman v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  5. Garlitz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Calhoun v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  2. Giles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  3. Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  4. Davidson v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API