Legal Opinion

Feick Ex Rel. Feick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 10, 1981No. 51540PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Justice.

Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company appeals from an order denying its motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment in favor of plaintiff Steven Feick. We reverse.

There are no disputed facts. On June 4, 1979, the minor plaintiff was injured in a collision between the bicycle he was riding and a motorcycle owned and driven by Bradley Hughes. 1 At the time of the accident, plaintiff was an insured under policies issued by defendant covering four vehicles owned by plaintiffs father. Plaintiff made a claim for basic economic loss benefits 2 under…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gudvangen v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Shoemaker v. National Ben Franklin InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. People v. BenevidesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Esler v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  5. Minneapolis-St. Paul Sanitary District v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Reiter v. KiffmeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. Kronebusch v. MVBA Harvestore SystemCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  3. In re the Welfare of R.S.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  4. Christopherson v. Federal Land Bank of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Haghighi v. Russian-American Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API