Legal Opinion

Esler v. United Services Automobile Ass'n

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 6, 1979No. 20976PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, Chief Justice:

This action was brought by appellant, against respondents, United Services Automobile Association (USAA) and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (Hartford) for the recovery of personal injury protection (PIP) benefits under the first party coverage of the South Carolina Automobile Reparation Reform Act. Appeal is from an order of the lower court denying recovery. Our review of the facts follows, in general, that contained in the Statement.

On July 18, 1976, appellant was struck, while on his bicycle, by an automobile being operated by an insured of respondent Hartford.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Belk v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Nationwide Insurance v. GodeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Gambrell v. Travelers Ins. CompaniesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  3. Yamaguchi v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Busby v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Jackson Ex Rel. Estate of Jackson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API