Legal Opinion
Turner Glass Corporation v. Hartford-Empire Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 7, 1949No. 9633PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERNER, Circuit Judge.
By this appeal plaintiff challenges the propriety of a judgment dismissing its cdfnplaint after a trial upon the merits.
Plaintiff, basing its claim upon a decree entered by the District Court of the Northern District of Ohio, United States v. Hartford-Empire Co., 46 F.Supp. 541, affirmed ; 323 U.S. 386, 65 S.Ct. 373, 89 L.Ed. 322, and 324 U.S. 570, 65 S.Ct. 815, 89 L.Ed. 1198, hereinafter referred to as the Toledo case, sued defendants to recover $5,000,000 together with treble damages alleged to have been sustained by defendants’ violation of §§ 1 and 2 of the Sherman…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Bruce's Juices, Inc. v. American Can Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Continental Wall Paper Co. v. Louis Voight & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Hartford-Empire Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Alfred Bell & Co. Ltd. v. Catalda Fine Arts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Herman Schwabe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- The Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corporation, the Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Richfield Oil Corporation v. Karseal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- United States v. Studiengesellschaft Kohle, M.B.H., Director Max Planck, Institut Fur Kohlenforschung, Hercules IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.