Legal Opinion

State v. Bainbridge

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1996No. S-95-067Published

1Opinion of the Court

543 N.W.2d 154 (1996)

249 Neb. 260

STATE of Nebraska, Appellee,

v.

Brian Howard BAINBRIDGE, Appellant.

No. S-95-067.

Supreme Court of Nebraska.

February 2, 1996.

Michael W. Heavey, Papillion, for appellant.

Don Stenberg, Attorney General, and Mark D. Starr, Lincoln, for appellee.

WHITE, C.J., CAPORALE, FAHRNBRUCH, LANPHIER, WRIGHT, and GERRARD, JJ., and NORTON, District Judge, Retired.

2Per curiam

This is an appeal by Brian Howard Bainbridge, defendant-appellant, from the denial of his application, pursuant to former Neb. Rev.Stat. § 39-669.19 (Cum.Supp.1992), for reduction to time served of a 15-year revocation of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. State v. HansenNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. MichalskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Bosselman, Inc. v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. PhilippsNebraska Supreme Court · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API