Legal Opinion

Nicotra Wieler Investment Management, Inc. v. Grower

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 10, 1988No. 13240PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.

The principal issue in this case is whether the tenant of a residential apartment complex that is being converted to common interest ownership has an exclusive right to purchase the apartment that he occupies even though the conversion plan does not make the apartment available for sale as a separate unit. The plaintiff, Nicotra Wieler Investment Management, Inc., brought this summary process action against the defendant, Melvin Grower, alleging the expiration of an oral lease by lapse of time. The defendant refused to vacate the apartment principally because the plaintiff had not complied…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  2. State v. BlaskoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. Dukes v. DuranteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  4. State v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  5. Simko v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Darak v. DarakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. BellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. City of Bridgeport v. DebekSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. Linden Condominium Ass'n v. McKennaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  5. Fruin v. Colonnade One At Old Greenwich Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API