Crisp v. Fort Wayne & Elmwood Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Hosmer, J.)
1DissentLong, J.
On January 2, 1892, Morris Pluff commenced suit in justice’s cqurt by summons against the plaintiff, and on January 21 a judgment was entered by consent against the plaintiff for $47 damages and $1.50 costs. On commencement of suit the defendant company was garnished, — the plaintiff being a street-car driver in its employ, — and on January 14 the company paid the amount due Crisp, $11.90, into court, and filed a disclosure, stating that that amount was due plaintiff at the time of the service of the writ of garnishment. Subsequently, the defendant company was garnished four times upon that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Osborne v. SchuttSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
- Moore v. C., R. I. &. P. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- Wilson v. BartholomewMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Curran v. FlemingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
- Barber v. HowdMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.