Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Bartholomew
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided November 10, 1880PublishedCited by 13 opinions
Error to Hillsdale. Garnishment. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.
"Wilson in 1869 recovered a judgment before a justice of the peace against George E. Loomis for $15.30 damages and $1.85 costs. On the 2d of December, 1879, and more than two and a half years later, Wilson proceeded on the basis of this judgment debt to garnish Bartholomew. The latter appeared and disclosed that he had in his barn a mare belonging to the principal defendant and worth not to exceed $40 in his opinion. Certain other proceedings occurred which do not seem important now. The usual summons to show cause was issued and Bartholomew regularly appeared pursuant to it, and issue was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Thompson v. School District Number SixMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Campau v. ButtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by13 opinions
- McFadden v. MurrayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1927
- Turner v. DavidsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- In Re SpradlinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
- J. L. Hudson Co. v. No-Name Hat Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
- McCormick v. KistlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.