Legal Opinion

Barber v. Howd

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Saginaw. (Edget, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.

This is an action of assumpsit commenced before a justice. Plaintiff declared orally on the common counts, filing a bill of particulars for medical and surgical services and appliances, furnished in October and November, 1889, amounting.to $125. Defendant, after commencement of suit, paid into the court the amount of plaintiff's claim and costs, except $50, and as to that amount he pleaded the general issue, and, in *222abatement, payment under garnishee proceedings. Plaintiff recovered before the justice, and defendant appealed to the circuit, where plaintiff again recovered.

In April, 1887, one…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hebel v. Amazon InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Newell v. BlairMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Wellover v. SouleMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Spears v. ChapmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Lorman v. Phœnix InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. M. M. Gantz Co. v. AlexanderMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Crisp v. Fort Wayne & Elmwood Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Holmquist v. SorensonMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API