Legal Opinion

Darcy v. Hartford Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 22, 1990PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.

After trial, a judge in the Superior Court concluded that Lillian Darcy and Mary Iglesias (plaintiffs), and third-party plaintiff, The Hartford Insurance Company (Hartford), could recover the proceeds of a liability insurance policy issued by Royal Globe Insurance Company (Royal Globe). Royal Globe has appealed, claiming that the delay in notice of the plaintiffs’ claims, and the failure of its insured to cooperate, permitted Royal Globe to disclaim coverage under the policy. We transferred the appeal to this court on our own motion. We agree with the judge that Royal Globe may not avoid…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. DiMarzo v. American Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. Diaz v. Eli Lilly & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  5. Miller v. DiltsIndiana Supreme Court · 1984

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Darcy v. HARTFORD INS. CO. ROYAL GLOBE INS. CO.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  2. Invensys Systems, Inc. v. Centennial InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API