Legal Opinion

Jones, Christina Carletta

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 17, 2013No. PD-0282-12PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KEASLER, J.,

delivered the unanimous opinion of the Court.

Christina Jones claims that her conviction for fraudulent use or possession of identifying information violated the doctrine of in pari materia because that statute conflicts with the statute defining the offense of failure to identify, carrying a lower penalty. Because the statutes differ in meaningful ways, we disagree and affirm the court of appeals’s judgment.

I. Facts

In November 2007, Jones was stopped for speeding by Addison Police Officer Jeff Sharp. Jones gave Officer Sharp her correct date of birth, but told him her name…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MartinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Alejos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Mills v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Azeez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  5. Ex Parte SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Peraza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
  2. Cortez, Damien HernandezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
  3. Gill, Ex Parte Tommy JohnCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
  4. Liverman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
  5. United States v. ShahCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API