Legal Opinion
In Re Orzel
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided January 25, 1985No. 83-479PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
The petitioners, Andrew and Helen Orzel, appeal the decision in two declaratory rulings issued by the State of Vermont Environmental Board (Board). Based on the findings of the Board in its rulings, we affirm its decision.
In 1973, petitioners purchased a ten-acre piece of property in the Town of Rutland. This property, which adjoins other property owned by the petitioners, is commonly known as “the gravel pit.” The gravel pit had been used intermittently by previous owners for the extraction of gravel. In 1978, the petitioners sold, and had removed, approximately 40,000 cubic yards of gravel…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- In Re Agency of Administration, Etc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- Committee to Save the Bishop's House, Inc. v. Medical Center Hospital of Vermont, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1979
- In Re McGrathSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
3Cited by25 opinions
- In Re VitaleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- In Re Taft Corners Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- In Re BarlowSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- In re Hale Mountain Fish & Game Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- Piche v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.