Legal Opinion

In Re Barlow

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 13, 1993No. 91-491PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

Petitioners Robert and Barbara Barlow appeal a

ruling by the Vermont Environmental Board requiring them to *516obtain an Act 250 permit to continue operating their gravel pit. They argue that their operation is exempted from review by 10 V.S.A. § 6081(b) because it preexisted the enactment of Act 250. The State has moved to dismiss this appeal, contending that the action is moot because petitioners have now received a permit. We deny the State’s motion to dismiss and affirm the Board’s decision that petitioners’ gravel operation is not exempt from the Act 250 permit requirements.

The land now known…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re Agency of Administration, Etc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  2. In Re Grievance of MoriartySupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  3. Town of Cavendish v. Vermont Public Power Supply AuthoritySupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  4. In Re McDonald's Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  5. In Re Killington, Ltd.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. In Re Appeals of LetourneauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  2. In Re WhiteSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  3. In Re LyonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  4. In re Hale Mountain Fish & Game Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  5. Flathead Citizens for Quality Growth, Inc. v. Flathead County Board of AdjustmentMontana Supreme Court · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API