Bicer v. Commonwealth

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

Gary L. Bicer, an unemployed machinist, was denied further unemployment compensation benefits when he refused an offer of employment as a “machinist/die maker.”1 His proffered justifications that the rate of pay was too low and that the work was not suitable were accepted neither by the referee nor by the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board). Raising the same contentions, Bicer timely *521appealed2 the Board’s order affirming the referee’s denial of benefits to this Court. We affirm.

We conclude that the rate of pay of the offered employment was not such as to…