Legal Opinion

Succession of Macarty

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 15, 1848PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from the Fifth District Court of New Orleans, Buchanan, J. cited Dorsey v. Creditors, 5 Mart. N. S. 401. 5 Mart. 416. 6 lb. 416. 9 lb. 365. 9 La. 284. .5 La. 46. Denis, Grailhe, and Soulé, contra.

1Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court was, pronounced by

Eustis, C. J.

This is an appeal taken by the residuary legatee of the late L. B. Macarty from a judgmentof the Fifth District Cuurt of New Orleans, by which a charge of $3,000 to each of two attorneys employed by the testamentary executors,- was allowed in .the latters’ account. There were two executors, and each employed his attorney. The appellant objects to the amount charged as unreasonable, and one which the succession is not bound in law to pay, and insists on its being reduced for each attorney to the sum of $1,000, which the executors have…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stein v. BowmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1836

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hunt v. HillSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  2. Peltier v. ThibodauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  3. In re the Estate of MungerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  4. Succession of WeilSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  5. Succession of RobinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API