Legal Opinion

Succession of Weil

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 3, 1944No. 37056PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMITER, Justice.

Touro Infirmary, the residuary legatee of decedent, Emanuel Leopold Weil, has appealed suspensively from a judgment awarding to Leopold Stahl -a fee of $15,-000 for legal services rendered as attorney for the executor in Weil’s succession proceedings. In an answer to the appeal, Stahl asks for an increase of the judgment to $20,000, the amount for which he was placed on the final account by the executor ; and he also prays for 5% per annum interest thereon from September 10, 1942, the date of the filing of the account.

Weil, who was a resident of New Orleans, a widower, and a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Dinkelspiel v. PonsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  2. Hunt v. HillSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  3. Peltier v. ThibodauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  4. Succession of v. TterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  5. Succession of FilhiolSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. CollierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  2. Efner v. KetteringhamSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  3. James, Robinson, Felts & Starnes v. PowellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Succession of GilmoreLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Succession of MichelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API