Johnson v. Holdrege Medical Clinic
Nebraska Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceGerrard, J.
While I concur with the majority’s judgment in this case, I write separately because I do not believe that the premises rule should be a bright-line rule for which there is never an exception. The premises rule is, of course, one subcategory of the familiar “going to and from work” rule in workers’ compensation cases.
I. “GOING TO AND FROM WORK” RULE
In Nebraska, the rule is that an injury sustained by an employee while going to and from work, at a fixed place of employment, does not arise out of and in the course of employment, subject to a few limited exceptions. See, P.A.M. v. Quad L.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Epler v. North American Rockwell Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Lollar v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1989
- Wiley Manufacturing Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Griffin v. Hydra-Matic DivisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Hughes v. Decatur General Hosp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.