Legal Opinion

Steltzer v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 10, 1912PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Perry Superior Court. — Hon. John Shortley, Judge. Suit to recover on assignments of, wages. The cause was tried in equity, and both parties -appeal. The defendant will be designated as- the appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwin, J.

The plaintiff sued on assignments of wages to be earned in the future by men in the employ of the defendant railway company; the assignments having been made to the plaintiff to secure indebtedness to him. All of the men making these assignments entered into the employ of the railway, company under written contracts, the material p-art of which is as follows: “In consideration of my being employed by the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company, and to enable me to receive credit for board, meals and lodging while I am in its employ, I hereby agree and consent that the, said Chicago,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Metcalf v. KincaidSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  3. Fred Miller Brewing Co. v. HansenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Henderson Johnson v. Sugar Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1925
  2. R. B. Tyler Co. v. Laurel Equipment Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Farmers & Merchants Savings Bank v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  4. Hartford Fire Insurance v. Citizens' BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  5. Boyce v. Farmers' Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API