Metcalf v. Kincaid
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Superior Court of Coimcil Bluffs, — Hon. J. E. F. McGee, Judge. Proceeding- to bold the Union Pacific Railroad Company as garnishee. There was a judgment against the garnishee, from which it appeals. —
1Opinion of the CourtKinne, J.
— The plaintiff, on December 31, 1889, brought his action against the defendant Kincaid before a justice of the peace, in which action a writ of attachment was issued, under which the railway company was garnished. Notice of garnishment was served on the company December 31, 1889. Thereafter the company answered that prior to the garnishment, and on October 29, 1889, it accepted the following assignment:
“Omaha, October 29,1889.
uMr. E. Young, Auditor.
“Dear Sir: — Please pay to Mr. J. J. Burns, Denver, Colorado, my salary as foreman oil house at Omaha, during the months of October, November,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Morrill v. NoyesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1863
- Kane v. CloughMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Smith, Twogood & Co. v. Clarke & HenleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
- Thayer & Williams v. KelleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1855
- Huntington v. RisdonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Mallin v. WenhamIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Amende v. Town of MortonWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- Seymour v. AultmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Springer v. J. R. Clark Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Steltzer v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.