Nathanson v. Nathanson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TURNER, P. J.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, Ermond Joseph Nathanson, and defendant, Anthony M. Nathanson, are brothers. Plaintiff appeals after the probate court denied his Probate Code1 section 850, subdivision (a)(2) petition for an order conveying commercial real property in North Hollywood (the property). In addition, the probate court denied plaintiffs judgment on the pleadings motion. The judgment on the pleadings motion asserted that defendant had violated the will’s no contest clause.
The testator, Margor Dayan, the mother of plaintiff and defendant, had an interest in the property.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Werner v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Winograd v. American Broadcasting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Abramson v. Juniper Networks, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Johnson v. GreenelshCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Colombo v. Kinkle, Rodiger & Spriggs, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Barriga v. 99 Cents Only Stores LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Barriga v. 99 Cents Only Stores LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Colombo v. Kinkle, Rodiger & SpriggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- Jobs & Housing Coalition v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.