Legal Opinion
State v. Kirker
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 10, 1998No. AC 16362; AC 16866PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPALLONE, J.
The defendant, Thomas F. Kirker, Jr., appeals from his conviction oflarceny in the first degree and criminal mischief in the first degree and from the resultant judgment of violation of his conditional release.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. Dominic Pianlca owns property at 615 North Stonington Road in Stonington, consisting of a house and approximately eighty-seven acres of land. Pianka’s property is bounded on the north by approximately 180 acres of land owned by Clifford Stimpson. Both Pianka and Stimpson testified that they were familiar with…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. MoralesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. FernandezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- State v. BemberSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. FasanoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. WrightConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- State v. WhiteConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. SimmonsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Soucy v. Haines, No. Cv95-0124874s (Jun. 20, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.