Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Midland National Bank

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 11, 1987No. 60,437PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McFarland, J.:

This action was commenced by Gary Peterson against defendant Midland National Bank seeking payment for hay provided to certain cattle in which Midland had a security interest. The Peterson claim was based, in part, upon foreclosure of a lien pursuant to K.S.A. 58-207. Inasmuch as this was a lien foreclosure action, the district court ordered Maijorie Wharton Wells and Wharton Ranches, Inc., brought in as additional parties defendant as they claimed liens in the same cattle. The district court ultimately found that Peterson did not have a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Water District v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. McGuire v. SifersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  3. Place v. PlaceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  4. Mai v. YoutseySupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  5. Bartlett v. HeerscheSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Haz-Mat Response, Inc. v. Certified Waste Services Ltd.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  2. J. W. Thompson Co. v. Welles Products Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  3. Kennedy & Mitchell, Inc. v. Anadarko Production Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  4. In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. In re Keurig Green Mountain Single-Serve Coffee Antitrust Litig.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API