Legal Opinion

Chinberg v. Gale Sulky Harrow Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1888PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from McPherson District Court. Action by The Company against Chinberg, upon a promissory note. Trial at the April Term, 1886, and judgment for plaintiff. The defendant brings the case here. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

This was an action on a note given in payment for a combined Gale sulky harrow and drill, sold by the Gale Sulky Harrow Manufacturing Company, to Alfred Chinberg, on September 21, 1883. The amount of the note was sixty-five dollars, payable with interest on or before October 1, 1884. The action was tried in the district court on appeal from a justice of the peace. The defenses were, payment, and also a breach of warranty.

Chinberg testified, among other things, that he delivered the note which he gave for the harrow and drill to E. A.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Craver v. HornburgSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  2. Gaylord v. StebbinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1866
  3. Eggan v. BriggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Laird v. FarwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  2. Baughman v. HaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API