Gargagliano v. Secretary of State
Michigan Court of Appeals
1ConcurrenceAllen, P. J.
I both agree and disagree in part with the opinions of Judges Kaufman and O’Hara. I agree with Judge O’Hara that there is no constitutional impediment to the temporary ex parte suspension of plaintiff’s driver’s license. It is true that Bell v Burson, 402 US 535; 91 S Ct 1586; 29 L Ed 2d 90 (1971), Fuentes v Shevin, 407 US 67; 92 S Ct 1983; 32 L Ed 2d 556 (1972), and the most recent United States Supreme Court case, North Georgia Finishing, Inc v Di-Chem, Inc, 419 US 601; 95 S Ct 719; 42 L Ed 2d 751 (1975), held that an ex parte seizure of a property right without the opportunity for a prior…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.