Legal Opinion
United States v. Aimone
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 25, 1983No. Nos. 82-5290, 82-5297, 82-5298, 82-5304 to 82-5307, 82-5511 and 82-5512PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WEIS, Circuit Judge.
Defendants in these consolidated appeals were found guilty of violating the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. They contend there was discrimination in the selection of grand jury forepersons and a variance between the conspiracy charged and the evidence at trial. They also challenge the verdict because the trial judge interviewed a juror during deliberations at the suggestion of counsel, and another juror reaffirmed her agreement with the verdict following a recantation shortly after a spectator’s emotional outburst in the courtroom.…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Rose v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brasfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- United States v. Richard P. Console, United States of America v. Morton Markoff, D.O., United States of America v. Edward C. CurcioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Hobby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harold S. McCLINTOCK, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Ronald J. Perholtz, United States of America v. Franklin W. Jackson, United States of America v. Gregory W. FletcherCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- United States v. HilandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.