United States v. Ronald J. Perholtz, United States of America v. Franklin W. Jackson, United States of America v. Gregory W. Fletcher
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion PER CURIAM.
2Per curiam
A jury convicted appellants Perholtz and Jackson of one count of racketeering and thirteen counts of mail fraud in connection with Postal Service and Small Business Administration (“SBA”) procurements. The jury convicted appellant Fletcher of ten counts of mail fraud in connection with the same SBA procurement. The jury also found forfeit certain property of Perholtz and Jackson related to their racketeering. Appellants challenge their convictions and the forfeitures on numerous grounds. We affirm in all respects.
I. Background
In an appeal from a jury’s criminal conviction,…
3Cases cited108 opinions
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by130 opinions
- United States v. SepulvedaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- James Odom v. Microsoft Corporation, a Washington Corporation Best Buy Co., Inc., a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Richard P. Console, United States of America v. Morton Markoff, D.O., United States of America v. Edward C. CurcioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Oliver L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Mylan Laboratories, Inc. v. Akzo, N.V.District Court, D. Maryland · 1991
125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.