Legal Opinion

Vincent v. S. Alexander's Sons Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 19, 1912PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action upon the common counts for wages, and for money expended at the request of the defendant, brought to the City Court of Meriden and tried to the jury before Fay, J.; verdict and judgment for the plaintiff for $92, and appeal by the defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

The plaintiff claimed to recover from the defendant, a corporation engaged in the clothing business, for three weeks services rendered tp the defendant and for $92 for money paid at its request to one Cushing. The main controversy between the parties was whether the services were rendered and the payments made for the defendant, as stated in the bill of particulars, or were made for two of its stockholders, Sidney A. and Gabriel W. Alexander. The defendant claimed that it did not employ the plaintiff to perform the services, nor to pay Cushing the money paid to him, but that the plaintiff and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ceeder v. H. M. Loud & Sons Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. McDonnell v. FordMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bernard J. Lee, Platiff-Appellant v. Jenkins Brothers, Bernard J. Lee v. Farnham YardleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  2. Harding v. StaplesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  3. Bernard J. Lee, Platiff-Appellant v. Jenkins Brothers, Bernard J. Lee v. Farnham YardleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  4. Blake v. New England Survey Service, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1950
  5. Centreal Co. v. Industrial Bank of Hartford, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API