Legal Opinion

McDonnell v. Ford

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Brevoort, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This is an action of assumpsit brought in the Wayne circuit court. Upon the trial before the court and jury, plaintiffs had verdict and judgment for $225. Defendant brings error. ,

The plaintiffs sued for a balance of account due them for labor and materials furnished defendant in building a house. Their claim was that they first prepared- two plans for the house. The first plan drawn was not used, but was paid for by the defendant, less $5. The house was built in accordance with the second plan. The plaintiffs’ claim upon the trial was that, after the second plans were drawn, the defendant…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Walker v. SymsMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Vincent v. S. Alexander's Sons Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  3. Philpott v. BechtelMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API