Legal Opinion
Ginsburg v. Cadle Co.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 16, 2001No. AC 19915PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
O’CONNELL, J.
The plaintiff, Robert A. Ginsburg,1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his amended petition for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence.2 He claims that the court improperly (1) held that he failed to sustain his burden *389of proof that there was newly discovered evidence, (2) held that he had the burden of due diligence in discovering untrue testimony and (3) failed to find that untrue testimony at the original trial in this matter affected the outcome of the case. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The genesis of this appeal is a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Turner v. ScanlonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- E. M. Loew's Enterprises, Inc. v. SurabianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Taborsky v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Gannon v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
- Kubeck v. Foremost Foods Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Morant v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Terracino v. Fairway Asset Management, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- LaCroix v. Glens Falls InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Giraud v. StateConnecticut Superior Court · 2011
- Ginsburg v. Cadle Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001