Legal Opinion

Naas v. Lucas

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 22, 1987No. 146,298; CA A38107PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, P. J.

Plaintiffs 1 allege that defendant, as an officer and director of USLS, breached his fiduciary duties to USLS and violated ORS 57.265 and ORS 57.511 by distributing, without authorization, USLS’ assets to a company in which he had a financial interest and to himself. Plaintiffs alternatively allege that defendant converted those assets. At the close of all the evidence, the trial court granted defendant’s motion for a directed verdict on the conversion claim. The jury returned a verdict for defendant on the other claims. Plaintiffs appeal, assigning error to the denial of their motions for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. American Timber & Trading Co. v. NiedermeyerOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Lee v. Wood Products Credit UnionOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. City of Rogue River v. DeBoerOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Hemstreet v. SpearsOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Oregon Bank v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Davis v. F. W. Financial Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. Hickey v. HickeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. K.F. Jacobsen & Co. v. GaylorDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2013
  4. Laursen v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. Naas v. LucasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API