Legal Opinion
K.F. Jacobsen & Co. v. Gaylor
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided May 28, 2013No. Case No. 3:12-CV-2062-ACPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ACOSTA, United States Magistrate Judge.
Introduction
K.F. Jacoben & Co., (“Jacobsen”) filed this action against its former employee, Ryan Gaylor (“Gaylor”), seeking damages resulting from Gaylor’s taking, retaining, and disclosing numerous confidential documents from Jacobsen, and an injunction preventing Gaylor from engaging in such conduct in the future. Gaylor initially moved to dismiss all five claims asserted by Jacobsen, relying on numerous extrinsic documents. On March 19, 2013, the court advised the parties that it “will not consider extrinsic evidence regarding…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Cooper v. PickettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- In Re DoubleClick Inc. Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- New South Equipment Mats, LLC v. KeenerDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2013
- Enhanced Environmental & Emergency Services, Inc. v. DelashmitDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2022
- Gosha v. Bank of New York Mellon CorporationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019
- Shita v. TaylorDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
- Warre v. Portfolio Services Limited, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2023