Potaschnik v. Kaimola
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Wayne; Mandell (Henry A.), J. Bill by Samuel Potaschnik against Leo Kaimola and another for the specific performance of a land contract. From a decree dismissing the bill, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.
The calendar entries in this case show that the decree which dismissed- plaintiff’s bill was filed and entered September 8, 1920; that the claim *407of appeal was filed and the statutory fee of $5 was paid October 16th, more than 20 days after the entry of the decree; that on September 28th “motion for new trial” (probably intended to mean motion for rehearing) was filed. It is insisted by the appellee that this court has not acquired jurisdiction due to the failure of appellant to comply with the provisions of section 19, chapter 50, of the judicature act (3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 13754). This…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Perkins v. PerkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Bolton v. CummingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Munroe, Boyce & Co. v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Guthrie v. Leelanau Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Hill v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Township of Cooper v. LittleMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Attorney General v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re Petition of Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Wolverine Packing Co. v. Oceana Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Stein v. SteinMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.