Hill v. Hill
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Simpson, J., presiding. Case by Bridget Hill against Matilda Hill for alienating the affections of plaintiff’s husband. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brought error.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, C. J.
Judgment was entered in this cause in the Wayne circuit court February 6, 1896. On May 25, 1897, an order was made by this court extending the time for issuing writ of error six months from February 6, 1897. That time elapsed August 6, 1897. The writ of error was issued out of this court on August 17, 1897. Motion is now made to dismiss the writ of error, for the reason that it did not issue within the time fixed by 3 How. Stat. § 8686.
The defendant (appellant) contends that, inasmuch as a motion for new trial was made and entered in the cause, the time fixed by the above statute did not…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Louisville Chemical Works v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1871
- Buckley v. SuttonMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Busch v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mueller Lumber Co. v. McCaffreySupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Kline v. MurrayMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- Gearin v. Portland Ry. Light & Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Hayes v. Ionia Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Potaschnik v. KaimolaMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.