Legal Opinion

Attorney General v. Public Service Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1987No. 78882, (Calendar No. 15)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

A statute provides that a party dissatisfied with a rate-fixing order of the Michigan Public Service Commission may file an action seeking judicial review within thirty days "from the issuance of such order and notice thereof.”

Another statute empowers the commission to grant rehearings, 2 and provides that the time allowed for commencing an action to review an order of the commission "shall continue after the order denying a rehearing or made upon a rehearing, for the same number of days” provided for review of the order upon which rehearing was sought. 3

The question presented is whether the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Communist Party of Indiana v. WhitcombSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Weller v. Hayes Truck LinesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  3. Mechanic Falls Water Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
  4. NJ Bell Tel. Co. v. DEPT., BD. PUB. UTILITY COMM'RSSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  5. Klopfenstein v. RohlfingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ass'n of Businesses Advocating Tariff Equity v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Attorney General v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Atty. Gen. v. PscMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API