Blochman Commercial & Savings Bank v. F. G. Investment Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
The appeals of F. G. Investment Company, a corporation, and of Rex B. Clark are based upon records which are identical, and may therefore be considered in a single opinion. The action was one to foreclose two mortgages and to enforce the liability of Rex B. Clark as a guarantor on two notes. The corporation, defendant, appeals from the judgment against it, which resulted in a decree of foreclosure, and defendant Clark takes an appeal from a personal judgment against him.
On October 10, 1912, the F. G. Investment Company made and executed two certain promissory notes, each secured by a mortgage…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- National Bank v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Harris v. RunnelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Gold-Mining Co. v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Berka v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Jones v. Guaranty & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Dougherty v. California Kettleman Oil Royalties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Laubisch v. RoberdoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Coronet Credit Corp. v. West Thrift Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Platte County State Bank v. FrantzWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
- Schuyler State Bank v. CechNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.