State v. Danek
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHAVEZ, Judge.
The State appeals the trial court’s grant of a new trial to defendant after a jury convicted defendant of several securities law, commodities law, and pyramid promotional scheme violations.
Specifically, the State argues that the reasons given by the trial court were insufficient to grant a new trial because: (1) the State was entitled to present evidence' of defendant’s prior conviction to the jury, and (2) the jury was properly instructed on the definition of a security.
Defendant cross-appealed challenging the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motions to dismiss, for…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Alexander v. Delgado Ex Rel. DelgadoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. TaylorNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. FergusonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
- State v. DuranNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. GriffinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. OrtizNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. GriffinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. DanekNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. CattNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.