Legal Opinion
State v. Danek
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided June 23, 1994No. 21276PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANSOM, Justice.
Having considered the State’s motion for rehearing of our opinion filed June 2, 1994, we deny such motion. In doing so, we withdraw our original opinion and substitute the following.
In an appeal by the State, the Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s grant of a new trial to Robert Danek. State v. Danek, 117 N.M. 471, 872 P.2d 889 (Ct.App.1993). We issued our writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals because of the pendency on certiorari of State v. Griffin, 117 N.M. 745, 877 P.2d 551 (1994), in which we have today filed an opinion. We consider whether the Court…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Alexander v. Delgado Ex Rel. DelgadoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. WilsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Beal v. Southern Union Gas Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
- State v. SheetsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. PahlColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. MarquartNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- State v. RadosevichNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
- Drake v. TrujilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. CattNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.