State v. Bastinelli
Washington Supreme Court
1Concurrence · HaleHale, C.J.
(concurring specially)—The court decides this case on what I think were the secondary issues presented, and in my view, the majority does not pass upon the crucial points presented and argued. Thus, the court’s opinion —erroneously, I think—is made to turn upon signed journal entries which, the court holds, showed a dismissal terminating the case beyond revival. But the journal entries or minutes are no more than evidence of judicial action; they do not constitute that action in and of themselves.
As I understand this record, the fundamental issue is whether the entries reflect a final order…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Rosellini.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. BaddaWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- Haney v. CheathamWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- State v. WilksWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Bino v. VeenhuizenWashington Supreme Court · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.