Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Super Valu

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 8, 1984No. C0-83-1602PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

This appeal arises from an order of the commissioner’s representative denying an application for reconsideration of a decision of an appeal tribunal. The appeal tribunal found that Douglas Erickson was discharged from his employment for misconduct. Therefore, the appeal tribunal held that Erickson was disqualified from receiving unemployment compensation benefits. Erickson was also told to repay the benefits that he had received between the time a claims deputy found that he was not disqualified and the time the appeal tribunal held that he was disqualified. Erickson…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Department of Employment Security v. Minnesota Drug Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Contribution Rate for 1973 of Fingerhut Corp. v. Department of Employment ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Leisure Hills of Grand Rapids, Inc. v. LevineCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Rowe v. Department of Employment & Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API