Legal Opinion

McKean Auto Co. v. O'Marro

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1929No. File No. 6311PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

This matter is now before us on rehearing. For former opinion, see Id., 53 S. D. 55, 220 N. W. 144.

Plaintiff sued in claim and delivery to recover a Flint automobile or the value thereof if redelivery could not be had. The automobile in question was the property of the plaintiff company, a dealer in Flint automobiles in Sioux Falls and vicinity, and 'by plaintiff intrusted to the possession of one Bumps, who sold the same to defendant. Plaintiff contended that such sale by Bumps was wrongful and unauthorized, and that he was not in any manner plaintiffs agent, but that plaintiff merely loaned…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  2. Union Constr. Co. v. Western Union Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Eppinger v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. L. A. McKean Auto Co. v. O'MarroSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Karlen v. Butler Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  2. Haberer v. Radio ShackSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Haberer v. Radio ShackSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API