Legal Opinion

L. A. McKean Auto Co. v. O'Marro

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1928No. File No. 6311PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPolley, J.

This action is brought to recover possession of a certain Flint touring car, or its value in case the car itself cannot be delivered. Defendant admits that he has possession of the car, but alleges that he purchased the same from plaintiff through a man by the name of G. Bumps, who was the duly authorized agent of plaintiff, and that he is the rightful owner of the said car.

The facts appear to be that plaintiff was an automobile dealer with a place of business in the city of Sioux Falls; that about the month of April, 1924, plaintiff -had in its possession a certain Flint touring car of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Merchants' National Bank v. Nichols & Shepard Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Reynolds v. FerreeIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Philips & Buttorff M'f'g Co. v. Wild Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1905
  4. George v. RossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  5. Wallis Tobacco Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McKean Auto Co. v. O'MarroSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  2. McKean Auto Co. v. O'MarroSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API