Legal Opinion

Flood v. Kalinyaprak

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 2004No. 03-165PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Warner

¶1 Debra Flood (Debra) appeals from an order of the Twentieth Judicial District Court, Lake County, equally dividing the proceeds of real estate assets she held as a tenant in common with Murat Kalinyaprak (Murat). We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for entry of judgment consistent with this Opinion.

¶2 We address the following issues on appeal:

¶3 Did the District Court apply the correct standard to the division of assets held as tenants in common by an unmarried couple in a partition action?

¶4 Were the District Court’s findings of fact clearly erroneous?

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Unified Industries, Inc. v. EasleyMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Daines v. KnightMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. In Re the Estate of McDermottMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Tillett v. LippertMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Lawrence v. HarveyMontana Supreme Court · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kulstad v. ManiaciMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. LeFeber v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Anderson v. WoodwardMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Kellogg v. Dearborn Information Services, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Kulstad v. ManiaciMontana Supreme Court · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API