Legal Opinion

AmerisourceBergen Drug Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 25, 2004No. 04-0063CPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARGOLIS, Senior Judge.

This post-award bid protest is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment on the administrative record. The parties completed briefing on March 5, 2004, and oral argument on the motions was held on March 11, 2004. Plaintiff, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation (“ABC”) challenges the United States’, acting through the Department of Veterans Affairs, (“VA” or “defendant”), award of a contract to McKesson Corporation (“McKesson” or “defendant-intervenor”), for the distribution of pharmaceutical products. Plaintiff challenges the VA’s award,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Alfa Laval Separation, Inc. v. United States, and Westfalia Separators, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  5. McAbee Construction, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Global Computer Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. Am General, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. Datamill, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  4. Precision Images, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  5. Rush Construction, Inc v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API