Hood River Distillers, Inc. v. Roger Louis Myers, D.B.A. Monopoles Alfred Rothschild
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
We have examined the meager record herein and have considered the appealed decision in view of appellant’s brief and oral argument. We have found nothing which persuades us of error in the statement of the case or the reasoning of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in its decision of November 14, 1962 (136 US PQ 274). We append the opinion hereto since we deem it unnecessary to write a separate opinion or to advance other reasons to support the decision therein. We therefore adopt the said opinion and affirm the decision of the board.
Before Leach, Lefkowitz, and Shryock,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Application of National Distillers and Chemical Corporation, Doing Business as National Distillers Products CoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Societe Anonyme Marne Et Champagne v. Roger L. MyersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Supreme Wine Co. v. American Distilling Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
3Cited by1 opinion
- Peyrat v. L. N. Renault & Sons, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965